1. Write the trial objective and acceptance scope
Start with the decision the trial must support. An early feasibility test may ask whether a product can be dosed and sealed in a proposed laminate. A factory acceptance test may need to prove an agreed machine configuration, pack drawing, output condition, quality checks and documentation. Do not combine these into an undefined demonstration.
List the included products, doses, pack sizes, film structures, lanes, coding formats and operating conditions. Record exclusions and remaining work. Where several variants are intended, identify a worst-case or representative set based on engineering risk rather than selecting only the easiest combination.
2. Control the product, film and environmental inputs
Identify the product batch and the properties that affect the process. These can include temperature, density, viscosity, aeration, foaming, particles, bulk density, flowability, moisture and static. Record how the sample was stored, mixed or conditioned before the run. A trial result is difficult to transfer to production when the input condition is unknown.
Identify the film by supplier, construction, thickness, reel width, core, winding direction, seal layer, print repeat and registration mark. Use production-intent film where possible. If temporary film is used, state exactly which questions remain unproven, such as barrier, print registration, code position, opening behaviour or long-term seal performance.
3. Record the machine configuration and settings
Record model, dosing unit, change parts, forming set, lane arrangement, seal tools, nozzle or chute, date coder and inspection devices. Capture the recipe or principal settings needed to reproduce the run, including fill timing, film advance, seal temperature, dwell or pressure where available, photocell mode and product-feed condition.
Settings should be treated as test evidence, not as universal production values. Film, ambient conditions, product and machine warm-up can affect the usable window. Note any adjustment made during the test and the reason for it.
4. Sample dose by lane, time and operating condition
Define the measurement method, calibrated equipment, nominal dose, permitted range and sample plan before the run. For a multi-lane machine, identify every sample by lane. For a single-lane machine, identify start-up, stable operation, refill, stop-restart or other challenge conditions where they matter.
Report individual results as well as summary statistics appropriate to the agreed plan. A total average can hide one lane running high and another low. Where a volumetric dose is checked by weight, record product density or other conditions needed to interpret the conversion.
5. Inspect seal formation and choose a suitable leak test
First inspect seal location, continuity, wrinkles, channels, trapped product, burn-through, delamination, cut position and opening features. Separate visual workmanship checks from pack-integrity testing. A visually acceptable seal is not automatically leak-tight, and a destructive test may not explain the cause of a defect.
The pack owner should select a leak or integrity method appropriate to the product, laminate, seal and distribution risk. Record conditioning, equipment, test medium or pressure where relevant, sample handling, pass criteria and how failed packs are investigated. Do not apply a generic pressure or duration to every sachet without technical justification.
6. Check registration, coding, cutting and finished-pack presentation
With printed film, confirm that the photocell tracks the approved registration mark and that artwork remains correctly positioned relative to longitudinal seals, cross seals, tear notch and cut. Check code content, orientation, position, contrast and permanence using the agreed inspection method.
Confirm whether packs leave individually, connected, perforated or in strips, and whether this is compatible with counting, collating, cartoning or manual packing. Record malformed cuts, incomplete separation and any lane-specific pattern.
7. State the conditions behind the accepted output
Define whether the figure is cycles, packs per lane or total accepted packs. Record test duration, number of lanes, product and film replenishment, normal stops, rejects and the point at which the machine was considered stable. Instantaneous display speed is not the same as sustained saleable output.
Where downstream equipment is included, test the line as an integrated system. The filler, film transport, coding, discharge, conveyor, counting and cartoning interfaces need compatible ready, running, fault and stop behaviour.
8. Build a traceable evidence pack
Label retained sachets with the trial reference, product, film, dose, lane and run condition. Keep dose sheets, seal or leak-test results, exception records, settings, photographs and run-video filenames under the same reference. Samples from start-up, stable operation and agreed challenges should be distinguishable.
The run video should show more than a close-up of moving jaws. Include machine identity, product and film feed, dosing, forming, sealing, coding, cutting, discharge, normal interventions and the operating condition linked to the results. Avoid edits that remove stops or make the test duration unclear.
9. Close the trial with an agreed outcome
Classify each requirement as passed, failed, conditionally accepted or not tested. Record deviations, corrective actions, ownership and retest requirements. A signed acceptance should identify the machine configuration and evidence reviewed rather than relying on a general statement that the machine ran.
Factory acceptance does not replace installation and site verification. Utilities, line interfaces, production materials, operator training and the customer environment should be confirmed at the appropriate stage.
Common trial failure modes and the evidence needed
| Observed issue | Evidence to collect | Questions to investigate |
|---|---|---|
| Dose variation | Individual samples by lane and time, product condition, refill events and dosing settings | Is the cause product feed, density, aeration, pump or auger behaviour, lane balance or the measurement method? |
| Product in the seal | Pack sequence, nozzle or chute video, fill timing, headspace and product behaviour | Does the product drip, string, dust, bounce or settle into the seal path? |
| Seal or leak failure | Failed pack location, seal appearance, film identity, jaw settings and documented test result | Is the cause contamination, film compatibility, temperature window, pressure, dwell, wrinkle or pack geometry? |
| Print or cut drift | Registration-mark drawing, pack sequence, photocell settings and artwork-to-seal measurements | Is the mark suitable and stable, is the web tracking correctly and is the repeat consistent? |
| One lane underperforms | Lane-labelled dose, seal and cut samples plus feed and tooling inspection | Is the issue confined to dosing, product distribution, web geometry, sealing or cutting on that lane? |
| Output below requirement | Timed run record, stop reasons, refill and reel events, rejects and downstream status | Was the target defined as instantaneous or accepted output, and which process step constrained the run? |